① 以書籍和電影你更喜歡哪個為話題，寫一篇英語作文如題 謝謝了
Many students, compared with reading original books, prefer to watch movies, because they think the film is more interesting , but it saves time and is easy to understand . But I prefer reading books, because there are more original details , the statement is very beautiful , to give people the joy of beauty .
② 啊，英語作文，關於讀原著好還是看電影好
Film orbook, which do you prefer?
Some of us think that it is better to see film than to read the book in theoriginal. For one thing, it savesus much time. Foranother thing, lively conversations andmovements are more funny than the black and white letters. What』s more, almosteveryone can make sense of them.
On the other hand, many people prefer the book in theoriginal. They think it not only has more details but also has beautifulsentences.
While in my opinion, I would rather read the original book than see thefilm. Because the original book is more meaningful than the film.
Besidesan original book is worth reading several times, which can give you a better understanding of the point.
So which do you prefer? Film or book, it』s a question.
③ 英語辯論:由書改編的電影比原著好嗎正方
其實，我個人還是比較喜歡看
原著
1.電影會刪掉許多原著上的
場景
，這樣有時候會讓
觀眾
看不懂。
2.原著會比電影更精彩
3.有時候電影還會篡改原著的
結局
，失去原著原有的深意。
4.如果，電影的
導演
或
主角
差強人意的話那就更讓人看得郁悶了。
打個比方:《哈利波特》，前幾部還可以，不過越到後來越差，5和6，如果不看原著的話，根本就看不懂。
《新基督山伯爵》更是直接篡改了結局，讓人看了很是無奈。
④ 以「電影和書，你認為哪樣更好」為題，寫一篇英語作文
someone like book.They said book can give them more details and it alway has beautiful lauguage .someone like movie ,because it can save they time and compared with book, it more interesting and easy understanding.
As for me ,i like book more.First of all ,it give me more spare and more time to think about the meaning of ever word .so i can remember details longer.
secongly,book often more real than movie .last but not the least ,i like collecting books,it make me happy!
⑤ 對比性英語作文，現在有些名著被改成電影，請問你是喜歡電影還是喜歡名著說出理由
People who love reading are frequently disappointed by the movie versions of their favorite books. There have been some great films made from books, but typically, movie versions of books
tend to aggrieve readers because they are not just like the book. When
a film director works from an adapted screenplay, the results are not
the same as reading the book, for various reasons. For example, a film
that precisely follows a novel likely would be too long for most
audiences to sit through at a single showing, so some things must be
left out. Also, a book can easily convey things to the reader that are
much more difficult for a movie to convey, such as background
information about the setting, the history and nature of characters'
relationships or even what characters are thinking at certain times.
Importance of Imagination
Books and movies
are very different entities. Films leave little to viewers』
imaginations. When reading, a person is creating his or her own movie
in a sense, and he or she decides many of the important parts: how the
characters speak, what they look like and what their surroundings look
like. This process of imagining and interpreting as a reader is a
creative process that is distinctly different from viewing a film.
Casting Decisions
When directors cast roles for films, the actor or actress inevitably
does not look the way that most readers of the book had pictured the
character. For instance, casting Tom Hanks as Robert Langdon in The Da Vinci Code
has been considered a significant mistake by many people. In fact, the
book describes Langdon as resembling actor Harrison Ford, who bears no
resemblance to Hanks.
Other types of casting decisions that often disappoint moviegoers are
when an actor or actress who is known for comedic roles is cast in a
dramatic role, or when an actor or actress is given a leading role in a
major film despite having acting skills that are considered less than
stellar. No matter how the actor or actress performs in the film, it can
be difficult for viewers who know him or her from other films to
disregard their previous impressions. An actor or actress who speaks
with an accent that does not fit the role — either because the character
should have a particular accent or because the actor or actress does
when the character should not — also can be disappointing for people who
"heard" the character's voice differently while reading the book.
Missing Material
A classic complaint about movie versions concerns the omission of
material that the reader finds important. If the director must make
film that is the proper length for a theatrical release, there is no way
to include everything, especially when it comes from a long novel. The
film version of Gone with the Wind, for example, omits the fact
that Scarlett O』Hara had two children by her first two husbands, and
she really disliked the children.
Perhaps the director wanted to make Scarlett more sympathetic and
knew that portraying this dislike would make people hate Scarlett. It is
an important aspect of the book, and it forms her character into a much
more complex person. The film, to many people, is better than the book,
but to other people, it is a good movie but not a faithful
representation of the book.
Making Changes
Another thing that might annoy people about the film versions of their favorite books is adding material to the story or changing material. There are many such complaints regarding Peter Jackson』s The Lord of the Ringsmovies,
for instance. Important material, such as the battle in the Shire at
the end of the last book, is deleted, and other material that was not
written by J.R.R. Tolkien was added to the films. These changes include
Arwen setting off for the Gray Havens and then nearly dying, Aragorn』s
flirtation with Eowyn, Sauruman』s death by falling off the tower of
Isengard and Frodo abandoning Sam before crossing into Mordor. Other
additions included Faramir torturing Gollum and kidnapping Frodo and Sam
as well as Faramir』s intention to seize the ring from Frodo.
Different Interpretations
Despite the complaints about differences from the Tolkien's books,
Jackson's films are widely considered to be quite good. The problem for
Jackson and other directors is that their interpretation of a book is
not the same as anyone else's. In the end, no director can satisfy
everyone who read the book, because he or she works off a personal
interpretation, might be under time constraint and is working in a
completely different medium. Each person creates a mental version while
reading a book, and no film version can live up to everyone's mental
vision.
⑥ 英語作文：電影和書你喜歡哪個說明理由
電影，我覺得電影視覺效果好，更容易記住裡面的情節
⑦ 一篇關於討論看電影好還是讀原著好的英語作文 80詞左右
這個不好說，
我們覺得還是原著好一點
看電影的話，有很多導演和編劇加進去的觀點
⑧ 一篇關於電影和書誰好的英語作文
關於我們受電影的影響比書的多的英語作文 In nowaday's fast paced society, we can hardly had any time to sit down, have a cup of tea and doing some reading as we all have so limited time and most people are so exhausted after work. Movie, on the other hand, is regarded as a better way for relaxation and killing time. Under this circumstances, movie exerted more influence on our life than books.
⑨ 關於讀原著還是看電影的英語作文80詞左右
To compare and contrast the To Kill A Mockingbird film vs.the book.The book is better,but watching the movie also enjoying.There were three differences that stood out,the absence of characters,the different scenes,and an actors to characters comparison.The book to the movie there is a clear difference but the morals are all still the same.The directors made some good changes and some bad ones the movie was good over all any ways.
From the book to the movie there were characters missing some important some not important at all.One character that I felt was missing that is important that wasn抰 there was Aunt Alexandra she was the whole be more like a girl role model for Scout.A character in the book that wasn抰 in the movie was Mr.Do
...
The Characters compared to the actors in the movie were good in some cases but bad in others.The same characters were the same heroes and the same characters got killed so the movie still resembled the book.In deleting the scenes they choose the created a different perspective of they story.
To Kill a Mockingbird
Movie
Vs.The character Jem is not as I had imagined him I thought he would be more physically fit.The overall moral was the same just not as clear.Rachael was an other character that was omitted from the book,dill was not living with her in the movie instead he live with Mrs.The movies mood differed from the book because it was in black and white.The school scenes were important they give insight on how the school was built.Another scenes that were deleted was the Dolphis Raymond scene were Dill drinks the coke that is supposed to be booze.lphus Raymond it wasn抰 a big deal though because he really didn抰 play a huge role anyways,just shows how people had to find away to not be ridiculed by others for liking bad people.Scout is a bit different that I thought I thought she would be bigger and more mature,in the story she acts really childish.
There were scenes omitted from the book were unnoticed some were missed.The director made the choice to delete these characters for a reason the only one that affected the book was Aunt Alexandra.
⑩ 電影和原著你更喜歡哪一種-英語作文100個單詞
Personally,I prefer books.Movies have only been around for a small amount of time and by favoring movies,I am not immersing myself in the words and thoughts of great women and men of the past.I can not imagine simply not reading books which have captured the hearts of so many people.Although many films try to bring out what the author was trying to say,they usually have big budgets and a lot of editing.I like that most of the authors who are famous,had incredibly raw and emotional lives and I really think that their inspiration came from that.
When reading a book,we are so engrossed into the story line that our mind's eye has crafted a picture and emotional response that is highly intense and real.With this in mind,a movie proction would be hard pressed to match what we already have formed within our mental file cabinet.